SHANGHAI, Feb 18 — A married Chinese tycoon who could no longer afford to support his five mistresses during the credit crunch held a contest to decide which one to keep.
But when one of the women was eliminated because of her looks, she decided to take revenge — and drove her former lover and her four competitors off a cliff.
She was killed in the crash, while the man and four other women were hospitalised, according to the Shanghai Daily.
At first, officials believed the car crash was an accident. Then details of the bizarre contest emerged in a letter left by the dead woman, a 29-year-old former waitress named only as Yu.
The woman met the entrepreneur, surnamed Fan, at the restaurant where she worked in the coastal city of Qingdao in 2000 and became his lover. Fan later introduced her to the four other mistresses — two of his employees and two former clients — with all given a £500 (RM2,600) monthly allowance and rent-free apartment, the report said.
However, when Fan's business ran into tough times, he decided to lay off all but one woman.
He hired an instructor from a modelling agency to run a private contest where the women were judged on beauty, singing ability and capacity to drink alcohol held at a hotel in May.
The cash-strapped businessman did not tell the women about his intentions. Yu was eliminated in the first-round beauty competition and a woman surnamed Liu eventually won after dominating the drinking round, the report said.
When Fan told Yu she was dismissed and that he was selling her apartment, she took matters into her own hands.
She convinced the group to go on a sightseeing tour with her before returning to her home province — then drove them all off a remote mountain road.
After the accident Fan paid Yu's parents the equivalent of £60,000 as compensation for her death.
The other four mistresses left him — as did his wife once she learned of his affairs. — Daily Mail
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Sex, privacy and newspapers
Today in this article on Star Online:
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/18/nation/3291623&sec=nation
there seems to be a major conflict between their opinions & UMNO's.
In this article it says -
"Despite everything we say about the right to privacy and our public position that Wong did no wrong, it will be hypocritical if those concerned still insist that she (Elizabeth Wong) pay the price with her resignation."
And Khir Toyo on the other hand is condemning her to her resignation.
So either Star is feeling the pinch from the public preference of transparent news & opninions (Malaysia Kini has been battling neck to neck in traffic with Star) or they made a mistake and let this slip OR its just something that's been planned to tame public anger.
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/18/nation/3291623&sec=nation
there seems to be a major conflict between their opinions & UMNO's.
In this article it says -
"Despite everything we say about the right to privacy and our public position that Wong did no wrong, it will be hypocritical if those concerned still insist that she (Elizabeth Wong) pay the price with her resignation."
And Khir Toyo on the other hand is condemning her to her resignation.
So either Star is feeling the pinch from the public preference of transparent news & opninions (Malaysia Kini has been battling neck to neck in traffic with Star) or they made a mistake and let this slip OR its just something that's been planned to tame public anger.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
NUDE PICTURES OF ELIZABETH WONG



BOO!! You friggin perverts!! haha
BUT MAN, for a mid-aged politician... unmarried, she's pretty alright isnt she.
And because of that, and because someone sneaked a camera into her private parts (coz she's mid-aged hot) and circulated it, she gotta quit. Now that aint fair but i mean...
-
-
She's obviously embarrased for making the only mistake of not drawing the curtains when she's feeling all-over hot & sexy on the couch.
-
SO i hope she gets over it and as she said outloud right, we're in a democracy so you got no reasons to be shy over whats circulated coz it aint breaking no law. Just gotta get over the - NOW dont look at me as if im gonna strip for you - and the - dont try and say you're sorry - environment.
-
But if she gets up, like Chua Soi Lek did over a much extensive coverage of a SEX scene, i take off my hat. And i hope she does just that
-
Tough journey for her though, with Selangor Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo taking every opportunity to condemn her saying she's morally unfit to continue... DUDE, are you seriously kidding? she gotta quit coz she forgot to draw her curtains?
-
Big conspiracy to take down the PR coalition. Started with Perak. Sounds like Selangor and Kedah could be next. ALL leading towards the crowning of Najis
Monday, February 16, 2009
Perak to go back to Pakatan Rakyat (or a loose coalition of DAP, PRK, PAS)
That's what I predict but i know it can go many ways and that the possibility of this happening is not very compelling but if it does, it'll also take time so for now, its really less than a prediction but it could happen.
RPK has very comprehensively articulated the situation so im not gonna bother writing...
-----
But the problem does not end here. What happens to the corruption charges against those two ‘independent’ State Assemblymen? Will the charges now be dropped? If the charges are dropped then it would become too obvious. But if the charges remain and they face trial, then another problem crops up.
First would be what surfaces in the trial. If the trial reveals they were fixed up, then Barisan Nasional would look bad. But if they were not fixed up and really are guilty of corruption, Barisan Nasional would also look bad. Both ways Barisan Nasional would look bad.
And if they are found guilty because they really are guilty then there will be two more by-elections in Perak, which the opposition will surely win. And we will end up with 30 opposition seats against only 29 from Barisan Nasional.
This means the Perak government will again change hands like it did last week, but this time from Barisan Nasional to a loose coalition of DAP, PKR and PAS.
Then we have the problem of Hee. She is expected to resign due to the pressure she is facing. This means yet another seat will fall vacant and yet another by-election will be held.Maybe over the 11 months since 8 March 2008, the loose coalition of DAP, PKR and PAS was running Perak with uncertainty about its future.
But the new Barisan Nasional government of Perak is not on any more solid ground than the previous government. It too faces the possibility of being driven out of office.
RPK has very comprehensively articulated the situation so im not gonna bother writing...
-----
But the problem does not end here. What happens to the corruption charges against those two ‘independent’ State Assemblymen? Will the charges now be dropped? If the charges are dropped then it would become too obvious. But if the charges remain and they face trial, then another problem crops up.
First would be what surfaces in the trial. If the trial reveals they were fixed up, then Barisan Nasional would look bad. But if they were not fixed up and really are guilty of corruption, Barisan Nasional would also look bad. Both ways Barisan Nasional would look bad.
And if they are found guilty because they really are guilty then there will be two more by-elections in Perak, which the opposition will surely win. And we will end up with 30 opposition seats against only 29 from Barisan Nasional.
This means the Perak government will again change hands like it did last week, but this time from Barisan Nasional to a loose coalition of DAP, PKR and PAS.
Then we have the problem of Hee. She is expected to resign due to the pressure she is facing. This means yet another seat will fall vacant and yet another by-election will be held.Maybe over the 11 months since 8 March 2008, the loose coalition of DAP, PKR and PAS was running Perak with uncertainty about its future.
But the new Barisan Nasional government of Perak is not on any more solid ground than the previous government. It too faces the possibility of being driven out of office.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Facebook pays US$65m to settle rival’s claim
NEW YORK, Feb 13 — Facebook paid US$65 million (RM234 million) to squash allegations that its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, stole the idea that has grown to become the world's largest social networking site, with more than 150 million users, it has been revealed.
The site was sued in 2004 by ConnectU, a company founded by former friends of Zuckerberg at Harvard. A deal was agreed last year, but until now its terms had been secret. Divya Narendra and twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss claimed Zuckerberg had worked on their concept of a social networking website for students at America's oldest university, and stolen the idea to build his version.
ConnectU said it deserved a substantial slice of the credit for Facebook, claiming it was worth US$15 billion.
Facebook wanted the details of the protracted legal battle kept confidential. It had reporters removed from a California court so talks could go on in secret.
This week, however, the law firm that represented ConnectU, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, sent a newsletter to clients saying Facebook paid US$20 million and handed over 1.2 million shares of common stock, valued at US$45 million by the court. The firm said it had revealed this in error.
The US$15 billion valuation of Facebook had been based on Microsoft's decision to pay US$240 million for a 1.6 per cent share in October 2007. That deal, much talked about, saw it fight off rivals Google and Yahoo.
According to court documents, Facebook's lawyers in its battle with ConnectU argued it was in reality worth far less than what Microsoft was prepared to pay, and hence the settlement should be substantially lower. Facebook, still privately held, valued itself at US$3.7 billion; as a result, ConnectU's share settlement should be US$11 million.
The figure, in an internal appraisal, was discovered by reporters from the Associated Press after a computer error. Unfortunately for Facebook it was Microsoft's valuation that was used by the court.
"US$65 million is a significant sum — it's certainly more than the cost of the defence," said Chris Scott Graham, an intellectual property lawyer with Dechert. "But it's a very small percentage of Facebook's valuation."
Since the two were founded in 2004, they have gone on to wildly divergent fortunes. ConnectU has fewer than 100,000 users, and the twins have instead made careers as rowers — they came sixth in the men's pairs at the Beijing Olympics.
They are disputing the US$13 million fee due to their law firm because it broke an agreement to keep the deal secret. The firm said it was an error. "Our PR people released something and it didn't get caught by the people who knew," said a spokesman. "We had a policy against talking publicly about this case." — The Guardian
The site was sued in 2004 by ConnectU, a company founded by former friends of Zuckerberg at Harvard. A deal was agreed last year, but until now its terms had been secret. Divya Narendra and twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss claimed Zuckerberg had worked on their concept of a social networking website for students at America's oldest university, and stolen the idea to build his version.
ConnectU said it deserved a substantial slice of the credit for Facebook, claiming it was worth US$15 billion.
Facebook wanted the details of the protracted legal battle kept confidential. It had reporters removed from a California court so talks could go on in secret.
This week, however, the law firm that represented ConnectU, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, sent a newsletter to clients saying Facebook paid US$20 million and handed over 1.2 million shares of common stock, valued at US$45 million by the court. The firm said it had revealed this in error.
The US$15 billion valuation of Facebook had been based on Microsoft's decision to pay US$240 million for a 1.6 per cent share in October 2007. That deal, much talked about, saw it fight off rivals Google and Yahoo.
According to court documents, Facebook's lawyers in its battle with ConnectU argued it was in reality worth far less than what Microsoft was prepared to pay, and hence the settlement should be substantially lower. Facebook, still privately held, valued itself at US$3.7 billion; as a result, ConnectU's share settlement should be US$11 million.
The figure, in an internal appraisal, was discovered by reporters from the Associated Press after a computer error. Unfortunately for Facebook it was Microsoft's valuation that was used by the court.
"US$65 million is a significant sum — it's certainly more than the cost of the defence," said Chris Scott Graham, an intellectual property lawyer with Dechert. "But it's a very small percentage of Facebook's valuation."
Since the two were founded in 2004, they have gone on to wildly divergent fortunes. ConnectU has fewer than 100,000 users, and the twins have instead made careers as rowers — they came sixth in the men's pairs at the Beijing Olympics.
They are disputing the US$13 million fee due to their law firm because it broke an agreement to keep the deal secret. The firm said it was an error. "Our PR people released something and it didn't get caught by the people who knew," said a spokesman. "We had a policy against talking publicly about this case." — The Guardian
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Who're we with? wonders the 3 running dogs
Amongst other things, the Perak trio have either been hailed as heroes, reviled as traitors, known as political frogs but now still remain independents.
Why aren't Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang), Osman Jailu (Changkat Jering) and Hee Yit Foong (Jelapang) — the three defectors — members of any Barisan Nasional component parties? Why are they still independents after causing the Pakatan Rakyat government to stutter, stumble and fall?
Simple.
Umno cannot be seen to be taking in two lawmakers who have been charged with corruption. That will truly confirm the Malay nationalist party as corrupt.
As it is, the party is already facing an uphill task battling the public perception that it is corrupt and beyond redemption. Enticing both Jamaluddin and Osman to jump ship has hardened that taint in people's minds.
As for Hee, she should be a prize that both the MCA and Gerakan would like to have in their battle for more seats in Perak and their national upmanship game to represent the Chinese within Barisan Nasional.
However, while they are the obvious parties for her to join, both fear the growing backlash from the Chinese community for taking in a "running dog" unlike in the past when the MCA and Gerakan gladly accepted defectors from the DAP.
But by contributing to the collapse of the popular Pakatan Rakyat government, Hee has become the most hated person among the Chinese and other Malaysians today, not just in the Kinta Valley but across the entire country.
The MCA and Gerakan do not want her. Pure and simple.
"Political suicide for us to take her", was what both MCA and Gerakan leaders say privately.
The current situation puts the trio in no-man's land. Independents and untouchables and without the official support of any political parties. One side hates them while the other side fears the public reaction to accepting them.
So while the Perak Barisan Nasional government publicly invites more Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers to cross the aisle and contribute to a unity government, rest assured none can and will join any Barisan Nasional component parties for a while.
In fact, those who did might not even be able to stand in the next general election if the ugly mood over their defections persists. Which makes you wonder why they even jumped in the first place?
Why aren't Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi (Behrang), Osman Jailu (Changkat Jering) and Hee Yit Foong (Jelapang) — the three defectors — members of any Barisan Nasional component parties? Why are they still independents after causing the Pakatan Rakyat government to stutter, stumble and fall?
Simple.
Umno cannot be seen to be taking in two lawmakers who have been charged with corruption. That will truly confirm the Malay nationalist party as corrupt.
As it is, the party is already facing an uphill task battling the public perception that it is corrupt and beyond redemption. Enticing both Jamaluddin and Osman to jump ship has hardened that taint in people's minds.
As for Hee, she should be a prize that both the MCA and Gerakan would like to have in their battle for more seats in Perak and their national upmanship game to represent the Chinese within Barisan Nasional.
However, while they are the obvious parties for her to join, both fear the growing backlash from the Chinese community for taking in a "running dog" unlike in the past when the MCA and Gerakan gladly accepted defectors from the DAP.
But by contributing to the collapse of the popular Pakatan Rakyat government, Hee has become the most hated person among the Chinese and other Malaysians today, not just in the Kinta Valley but across the entire country.
The MCA and Gerakan do not want her. Pure and simple.
"Political suicide for us to take her", was what both MCA and Gerakan leaders say privately.
The current situation puts the trio in no-man's land. Independents and untouchables and without the official support of any political parties. One side hates them while the other side fears the public reaction to accepting them.
So while the Perak Barisan Nasional government publicly invites more Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers to cross the aisle and contribute to a unity government, rest assured none can and will join any Barisan Nasional component parties for a while.
In fact, those who did might not even be able to stand in the next general election if the ugly mood over their defections persists. Which makes you wonder why they even jumped in the first place?
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Japan
I was in Japan recently and although i didnt enjoy my day tours to the various sorts of temples - like the golden temple, the love temple, the temple-looking castle, the temples which are actually shrines, the temple built on stilts and the more popular Kiyomizudera temple (picture below - i think) which i think is the one built on stilts -

Japan is not only the land of the rising sun, but the land of bright shining lights - so bright, you turn black

When you eat at street stalls in Japan, you buy your meal ticket from a vending machine. And this is really something the Japanese are so obsessed with - VENDING MACHINES. These vending machines sell ice cream, drinks, ciggies, alcohol, used panties, food coupons and you name it... one day, you prolly see geishas coming out from vending machines.

Japanese women hate it, i mean hate it when they see men enjoy their food, especially when its Tako Yaki, which is a serving of Octopus balls. Maybe they play with it alot, so get insulted when you eat it.


In Japan, never take pictures when you're boarding the MRT, or LRT or whatever the Japanese call it.

For the women get PISSED OFF at you. Because when you take pictures in the train, it is believed that the dead (from train accidents) will come in the train and rape all the women.

Then hang your wish on a rack. One thing, though. You need to put on a globlin looking face so the gods get so frightened they grant you your wish almost immediately

This Indonesian guy travelled all the way to Japan when he heard of this (coz he's got a really ugly face) so his kids could get an Audi A4 and a Misubishi Evo X and so despite his really ugly face, he finds a girlfriend.


I enjoyed learning of their very interesting (some bizzare) culture. Like when you celebrate a birthday is Japan, the man needs to present the cake to the birthday lady (and vice versa) while holding a beer can with his left hand.
The girl in response, as a sign of gratitude, is obliged to express extreme surprise (like saying - OMG Jerry-ato, why did you even bother with my birthday... but im SOOOO happy!). You know, Japanese practise the art of expressing their feelings in quite a bizzare way.

Japan is not only the land of the rising sun, but the land of bright shining lights - so bright, you turn black

When you eat at street stalls in Japan, you buy your meal ticket from a vending machine. And this is really something the Japanese are so obsessed with - VENDING MACHINES. These vending machines sell ice cream, drinks, ciggies, alcohol, used panties, food coupons and you name it... one day, you prolly see geishas coming out from vending machines.

Japanese women hate it, i mean hate it when they see men enjoy their food, especially when its Tako Yaki, which is a serving of Octopus balls. Maybe they play with it alot, so get insulted when you eat it.
Sorry, Tako Yaki is actually baby Octopuses wrapped in flour balls. I still cant explain Marilyn's expression.
In Japan, I saw a nice SL600 wrapped in swarovski crystals. The interior had a gold platted sterring wheel and cup holder


In Japan, never take pictures when you're boarding the MRT, or LRT or whatever the Japanese call it.

For the women get PISSED OFF at you. Because when you take pictures in the train, it is believed that the dead (from train accidents) will come in the train and rape all the women.
I found this quite bizzare - ladies getting pissed off at you in the train - so i took this picture to remember this pretty weird incident
In the shrine, when you're wishing for whatsoever kind of luck, this is what you gotta do. First wash your hands with a wooden ladder.

Then hang your wish on a rack. One thing, though. You need to put on a globlin looking face so the gods get so frightened they grant you your wish almost immediately

This Indonesian guy travelled all the way to Japan when he heard of this (coz he's got a really ugly face) so his kids could get an Audi A4 and a Misubishi Evo X and so despite his really ugly face, he finds a girlfriend.

In Japan, you push the girls around in sheltered motorbikes


In Japan, when you're posing for pictures, you NEED to act cute.

Oh here's a vending machine selling ciggies that was supposed to be posted higher up in this blog, where i was talking about vending machines

Across various countries & cultures in the world, ive came across people chucking coins into ponds, fountains, wells, and other water substances for good luck. But in Japan, ppl throw coins at a rock
At the golden temple in Japan, the person with the sharpest nose gets a glow in their face
If you think its only for the younger girls, NO. Even the old bitches gotta act cute.

Oh here's a vending machine selling ciggies that was supposed to be posted higher up in this blog, where i was talking about vending machines

Across various countries & cultures in the world, ive came across people chucking coins into ponds, fountains, wells, and other water substances for good luck. But in Japan, ppl throw coins at a rock
At the golden temple in Japan, the person with the sharpest nose gets a glow in their faceThe whites in Japan......... i think id rather spare this.

Vending machines again............ Oh but this vending machine is very special. If you're feeling freezy, you can buy a dosage of fire to warm you up. See Jerry checking it out. He had frozen hair before the dosage

Vending machines again............ Oh but this vending machine is very special. If you're feeling freezy, you can buy a dosage of fire to warm you up. See Jerry checking it out. He had frozen hair before the dosage
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








